Now Reading
Time for Council to take charge

 

Time for Council to take charge

The deputy Minister of Transport has written Hamilton Council proposing that ministry officials visit Council in June to answer questions about Hamilton’s LRT project. The meeting will be more purposeful if members of council can provide City Manager Janette Smith, who reports to council, with a list of the questions they would like answered.

Some of the obvious ones are:

  • Is this project to be a design-build-finance model as was previously projected? Note that large companies like SNC Lavalin have recently said they won’t bid on any more of these projects where the risk lies entirely with the contractor. They had to sue Metrolinx to get compensated for COVID-related delays on the Eglinton Crosstown and they won.
  • Who gets the farebox revenue on the LRT-Hamilton or Metrolinx?
  • Regardless of who gets the farebox, HSR staff need to provide a financial impact study on the rest of the HSR system, as three of the HSR’s best-performing lines from a revenue perspective will be seriously impacted by the LRT. Right now, the city subsidizes HSR by over $30 Million a year will that go up or down after LRT? Everybody is talking about operating and maintenance costs, but what about the potential of a double whammy with a need for more subsidy for the rest of the HSR?
  • Both senior governments, in making their joint funding announcement used the phrase “up to” $1.7 Billion. Who pays if the construction costs run over the $3.4 Billion? Because we know that never happens with projects of this size and scope.

The only way council is going to get straight answers on these critical questions is to be seen to be in change of these discussions. Remember the mushroom treatment council got from Metrolinx officials in the last-go round with council on this topic. One way of achieving that, is to have council take the lead by forming or re-forming the ad-hoc LRT committee that was operating in 2017. Metrolinx must clearly see that they have to deal with council, not a mayor and the city manager, who, in the absence of clear direction from council will be forced to take her cues from Mayor Eisenberger.

This project, from the outset has operated under a cloak of exaggerated claims, behind-the-scenes manipulation and outright falsehoods. Council to a degree, has allowed this to happen, but there is still time to restore some integrity to the process, so that at least council, and the voters can go forward with open eyes.

What's Your Reaction?
Don't Agree
0
Happy
3
In Love
1
Not Sure
1
View Comments (4)
  • Once again, Mr Best brings up very valid queries about this so called deal.

    People in sales, pull numbers from the air, no documentation, no backup.

    I ask if the government has all this money then why are so many homeless why are do many in fear of becoming unhoused because they can no longer afford housing?

    Graham Cubitt was on the Scott Radley show and I found it disconcerting that there is no one definition of affordable housing.

    Capitalism causes competition between groups when there should be none. We have many good people trying their best to address the issue yet some of those voices have been criminalized.

    It is disconcerting that those who attain positions of power do not promote the low income voice. Too busy climbing the corporate ladder in ensuring the status quo retains its hold. These people are awarded as heroes yet those who truly fight for justice are dismissed and criminalized.

    One only has to look at the past, as the working class fought for rights and were killed., incarcerated and labelled as seditious.

    Whatever gains were made, are slowly being stripped away.

    Critical thinking folks.

  • It’s important to point out than Hamilton us much different than other LRT operations.A city on two levels.Future operating cost dealing with increases operating cost on this all electric system will see future cost rise.That will impact everything from operating ,fares. and future taxes .Can this city support two transit operations? One would have to say NO.This LRT would also hurt HSR lost fare revenue and any increase in LRT would force HSR fares to match.Also a concern if Metrolinx uses union workers to operate the system .What happens if that group goes on strike?How does Hamilton react to that?It’s clear that in KW and Ottawa that they are having a number of concerns that has caused ridership incoventions.breakdiwns,reliabity etc.Many more questions as we go forward.Its not good.We still don’t have the required ridership numbers.

  • The Hamilton public have been left out again.Never got a ballot Yes or No ballot.Its a tax payers right NOT METROLINX OR LIUNA OR ANYONE ELSE.

  • .M &O garage cost first year$20M original cost $40M .+Why the difference?Should be a report showing how those cost,how they differ.A lineby line review should be available.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

© 2019 The Bay Observer. All Rights Reserved.

Scroll To Top