If newspaper readers could overhear some of the conversations that take place in newsrooms everywhere, it would debunk once and for all any notions of journalistic “objectivity.” Reporters are not scientists empirically sifting facts to arrive at a reasoned conclusion. More often than most would admit, it is the reverse—a search for facts to support a conclusion already drawn. The trick is to not get caught as blatantly as the Toronto Star has in its relentless pursuit of dirt about Toronto Mayor Rob Ford. The latest episode came just before Christmas when National Post writer and founder Conrad Black revealed that a Toronto Star reporter Marco Chown Oved had sent a letter to 70 prominent Torontonians inviting them to comment on the mayor’s crack smoking and possibly drunk driving.

That, as a news gathering tactic, in itself is stooping pretty low for a major metrpolitan newspaper, but the request took on the tone of a shakedown with the following words… If you do not wish to respond, we appreciate if you would tell us why. If we receive no response, we will publish that also.” In other words, “if you don’t participate in this gang-tackle, we will out you as some kind of fellow traveller.” Wrote Black, “It won’t fly — any of it… The Star’s attempted coup was a failure, and the hare-brained effort to dragoon civic leaders, bankers and advertisers into the plot backfired.” The Falstaffian Ford is an easy target given his public persona as a binge drinker and crack cocaine user. But the Star’s issue with Ford is none of that—much as they would protest to the contrary. For the Star, the issue with Ford is that he openly sneered at what he considered a gaggle of politically correct, precious urbanists who read the Star like it’s the New Testament and flocked to the likes of David Miller and Barbara Hall. Despite a furious editorial campaign to prevent Ford from getting elected, he prevailed easily, outstripping his nearest opponent by almost 100,000 votes. The boozing and crack use are not the reason the Star hates Ford, they hated him from the outset and the personal peccadilloes provide justification for the newspaper’s obsession with removing Ford from office.

Just last week a Star columnist was whining that it wasn’t Rob Ford who was the community leader during the ice storm, it was the deputy mayor. That may be, but it was Ford’s face that was seen several times daily at news conferences during the crisis. It is a sad comment on the diminishing influence of journalism these days when the largest paper in the land can throw everything they can muster at an admittedly flawed personality only to see his approval ratings remain in the high 40 percent range–a number that is sure to slip as Ford, like other addicts backslides from time to time. Whatever damage the Star revelations have caused to Ford, the self-inflicted damage to the newspaper’s reputation by this campaign of bullying and intimidation is much greater.

John Best has had a lengthy media management career, in television and radio and now print. As Vice President, News at CHCH in Hamilton, John oversaw a significant expansion of the news operation. He founded Independent Satellite News, Canada’s only television news service providing national content to Canadian independent TV stations. John is a frequent political commentator on radio and television, a documentary producer and author of a book and numerous articles on historical and political subjects. John is a past recipient of the New York Festival’s award for writing in the International TV category.

3 Comments to: A peek behind the curtain at the Star

  1. Rich Pascoe

    January 30th, 2014

    “…a search for facts to support a conclusion already drawn. The trick is to not get caught as blatantly as the Toronto Star has in its relentless pursuit of dirt about Toronto Mayor Rob Ford.”

    Am I mistaken, or has not every report in the Star about Rob Ford’s serious abuse of alcohol/marijuana/crack cocaine/power proven to be true? The Globe and Mail has it’s own team of investigative journalists bringing additional facts to light, and now the Toronto Sun (see Michelle Mandel’s superb seven part expose) has joined in uncovering more ‘dirt’ about this serially flawed embarrassment of a mayor. Regrettably your article reveals only that you have an axe to grind against the Star. Perhaps next time you will provide a more objective analysis of the person who has brought shame and dishonor upon himself and to the office he holds, to say nothing of the disrepute his words and deeds have brought to a great city.

    • John Best

      January 30th, 2014

      The point of the editorial was that the Star’s vendetta against ford predates the Mayor’s misdeeds. The misdeeds are a gift from Ford to the Star.

  2. Paul

    January 31st, 2014

    I don’t think anything predates Rob Ford’s misdeeds. One doesn’t just get out of bed one morning in his mid-40s and decide to behave that way. I suspect that his personal behaviour was known to a small group, but no one really cared until he became Mayor of Canada’s largest city, a glass house akin to the one occupied by the Premier or the Prime Minister. It’s no surprise that a liberal rag like the Toronto Star never liked a conservative like him in the first place, and yes, he handed them all the ammunition they needed on silver platter. There is now growing evidence on several fronts of efforts made to silence those who might “spill the beans”. In any case, whatever may have motivated the Star’s initial investigative efforts, those revelations were and are most certainly in the public interest. It’s patently unfair to suggest that they drew a conclusion and then cherry picked facts to support it.


Leave a Reply

  • (not be published)